Migrate your Nozbe data
European-made task-based PM tool for small teams and solo users who follow GTD. Simple Projects→Tasks→Comments structure with no free tier and limited migration tooling.
In its favor
Why people choose Nozbe
The signal that keeps Nozbe on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.
GTD-native design with Inbox, Categories, and Context views built in — users who already follow Getting Things Done adopt Nozbe without workflow redesign.
Cross-platform availability on Mac, Windows, iOS, Android, and web means individuals and small teams can stay productive on any device without paying per-platform.
Task-based communication model where discussions happen inside Tasks rather than in separate chat tools reduces context switching for small, collaborative teams.
European data residency and GDPR compliance appeal to users in the EU who prefer a Poland-based vendor over US-hosted alternatives.
Calendar view with task history gives individuals a chronological view of completed work without requiring a separate time-tracking tool.
Price-to-feature ratio feels high — comparable tools like Asana offer broader project management at similar or lower cost, and Nozbe lacks time tracking, natural language input, and custom themes.
No free tier exists, making it difficult for teams to evaluate the product before committing, especially when competitors offer generous free plans.
Limited export and API access makes data portability a real concern; users who want to leave find they cannot easily extract their full history including tags, priorities, and recurring task rules.
The product split between Nozbe Classic and new Nozbe creates confusion and upgrade friction; some users feel forced into a migration they do not want.
Attachment handling is basic — no built-in document management, version history, or rich media preview, causing teams that rely on file attachments to seek alternatives.
Reasons to switch
Why people leave Nozbe
The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Nozbe. Presented as facts, not knocks.
Platform scorecard
Strengths, weaknesses, and where Nozbe fits
Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.
SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit
Strengths
Weaknesses
Where it works
Where it struggles
Pricing tiers
Nozbe pricing overview
Nozbe uses a per-user annual subscription model. Pricing increased in February 2026. No free tier for teams — the Free plan is individual-only. Payments are processed via Stripe or Verifone; credit cards, PayPal, and wire transfers (Poland only) are accepted. Apple and Google Play in-app purchases are also supported.
Free
Tier 1 of 3
Free
What's included
Need help selecting your Project Management?
Book a free 30 minute consultationPricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Nozbe's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →
What gets migrated
Nozbe object support
Object-by-object support for Nozbe migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.
Projects
Fully supportedProjects are the top-level container in Nozbe's hierarchy. They support visibility controls (team-wide vs. limited access to specific members), project groups, and completion status. We map Projects 1:1 to the destination Project object and preserve visibility settings as project-level permissions.
Tasks
Fully supportedTasks are the core work unit in Nozbe. They carry due dates, recurrence rules, priority levels, assignees, and a Done/undone state. We map Tasks to the destination's Task or To-Do object and preserve Priority, Due Date, and Recurrence as native fields. Assignee mapping requires a user cross-reference table since user IDs differ between systems.
Comments
Fully supportedComments are threaded under Tasks as the primary communication mechanism in Nozbe's task-based model. We preserve the full comment history under each Task, including author, timestamp, and @mentions. Mentions do not transfer as live links to the destination unless the destination supports an equivalent mentions system.
Tags
Mapping requiredNozbe supports Tags for labelling tasks across projects. Tags are a flat list per workspace. We map Tags to the destination's Label or Tag system, but since Nozbe Tags have no hierarchy, nested label structures in the destination must be flattened or manually reorganised after migration.
Categories
Mapping requiredCategories are part of Nozbe's GTD implementation and allow grouping tasks by context type (e.g., @calls, @home). They are distinct from Tags and appear in the left sidebar. We map Categories to Tags in the destination since most PM tools do not have a separate Categories concept, and we note this remapping in the scope document.
Attachments
Fully supportedFiles attached to Tasks are supported. We transfer attachment URLs and re-attach them where the destination supports file linking. Nozbe Classic export includes attachments; new Nozbe integrations with OneDrive and Dropbox mean some files may be stored externally — we preserve links but cannot guarantee the destination can open them without authentication.
Recurrence
Fully supportedTasks support recurring patterns (daily, weekly, monthly, custom). Recurrence rules are stored per task. We translate Nozbe recurrence patterns to the destination's native recurrence format where supported, or convert to a series of individual dated tasks where the destination lacks recurrence.
Inbox Items
Not in this platformNozbe's Inbox is a GTD capture zone for unsorted tasks and does not exist as a distinct persistent object in most destination PM tools. We do not migrate Inbox items as Inbox items — we migrate them as Tasks in the destination's default task list and flag this in the scope document.
Team Members
Mapping requiredTeam Members are users in a Nozbe workspace. They have roles (admin, member) and can be assigned as task owners. We map Members to Users in the destination, but email addresses and profile information must be confirmed during the scoping call since Nozbe's user export is limited.
Business Spaces
Mapping requiredBusiness Spaces are an enterprise organisational unit in new Nozbe, separate from Projects. They allow grouping of multiple teams. We map Business Spaces to the destination's Workspace or Organisation concept, but since many PM tools do not have a two-level organisational structure, Spaces may need to be represented as Projects or Tags.
Custom Fields
Not in this platformNozbe does not expose a Custom Fields feature in its public data model. Tasks carry only standard attributes (due date, priority, recurrence, assignee). We flag that any destination custom field definitions cannot be pre-populated from Nozbe and must be created manually in the destination.
Time Entries
Not in this platformNozbe has no built-in time tracking or time entry logging. While some users track time informally in task comments, there is no structured time entry object to migrate. We do not migrate time tracking data from Nozbe.
| Object | Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Projects | Fully supported | Projects are the top-level container in Nozbe's hierarchy. They support visibility controls (team-wide vs. limited access to specific members), project groups, and completion status. We map Projects 1:1 to the destination Project object and preserve visibility settings as project-level permissions. |
| Tasks | Fully supported | Tasks are the core work unit in Nozbe. They carry due dates, recurrence rules, priority levels, assignees, and a Done/undone state. We map Tasks to the destination's Task or To-Do object and preserve Priority, Due Date, and Recurrence as native fields. Assignee mapping requires a user cross-reference table since user IDs differ between systems. |
| Comments | Fully supported | Comments are threaded under Tasks as the primary communication mechanism in Nozbe's task-based model. We preserve the full comment history under each Task, including author, timestamp, and @mentions. Mentions do not transfer as live links to the destination unless the destination supports an equivalent mentions system. |
| Tags | Mapping required | Nozbe supports Tags for labelling tasks across projects. Tags are a flat list per workspace. We map Tags to the destination's Label or Tag system, but since Nozbe Tags have no hierarchy, nested label structures in the destination must be flattened or manually reorganised after migration. |
| Categories | Mapping required | Categories are part of Nozbe's GTD implementation and allow grouping tasks by context type (e.g., @calls, @home). They are distinct from Tags and appear in the left sidebar. We map Categories to Tags in the destination since most PM tools do not have a separate Categories concept, and we note this remapping in the scope document. |
| Attachments | Fully supported | Files attached to Tasks are supported. We transfer attachment URLs and re-attach them where the destination supports file linking. Nozbe Classic export includes attachments; new Nozbe integrations with OneDrive and Dropbox mean some files may be stored externally — we preserve links but cannot guarantee the destination can open them without authentication. |
| Recurrence | Fully supported | Tasks support recurring patterns (daily, weekly, monthly, custom). Recurrence rules are stored per task. We translate Nozbe recurrence patterns to the destination's native recurrence format where supported, or convert to a series of individual dated tasks where the destination lacks recurrence. |
| Inbox Items | Not in this platform | Nozbe's Inbox is a GTD capture zone for unsorted tasks and does not exist as a distinct persistent object in most destination PM tools. We do not migrate Inbox items as Inbox items — we migrate them as Tasks in the destination's default task list and flag this in the scope document. |
| Team Members | Mapping required | Team Members are users in a Nozbe workspace. They have roles (admin, member) and can be assigned as task owners. We map Members to Users in the destination, but email addresses and profile information must be confirmed during the scoping call since Nozbe's user export is limited. |
| Business Spaces | Mapping required | Business Spaces are an enterprise organisational unit in new Nozbe, separate from Projects. They allow grouping of multiple teams. We map Business Spaces to the destination's Workspace or Organisation concept, but since many PM tools do not have a two-level organisational structure, Spaces may need to be represented as Projects or Tags. |
| Custom Fields | Not in this platform | Nozbe does not expose a Custom Fields feature in its public data model. Tasks carry only standard attributes (due date, priority, recurrence, assignee). We flag that any destination custom field definitions cannot be pre-populated from Nozbe and must be created manually in the destination. |
| Time Entries | Not in this platform | Nozbe has no built-in time tracking or time entry logging. While some users track time informally in task comments, there is no structured time entry object to migrate. We do not migrate time tracking data from Nozbe. |
Gotchas
What to watch for in Nozbe migrations
Issues we've hit on past Nozbe migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.
No public API on new Nozbe forces file-based migration
Nozbe Classic and new Nozbe are separate products with no bidirectional sync
Tags and Categories require manual reconciliation post-migration
Recurring tasks may generate duplicate entries in the destination
| Severity | Issue |
|---|---|
| High | No public API on new Nozbe forces file-based migration |
| Medium | Nozbe Classic and new Nozbe are separate products with no bidirectional sync |
| Medium | Tags and Categories require manual reconciliation post-migration |
| Low | Recurring tasks may generate duplicate entries in the destination |
Leaving Nozbe?
Where Nozbe customers move next
5 destinations Nozbe can migrate to.
How a Nozbe migration works
Four steps, Nozbe-specific
Connect
Not publicly documented into Nozbe. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.
Map
We translate Nozbe-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.
Sample
Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Nozbe quirks before production.
Migrate
Full migration with Nozbe rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.
FAQ
Nozbe migration FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Nozbe migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Can't find your answer?
Walk through your Nozbe migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationOther project management tools we support
Ready when you are
Migrate Nozbe.
Without the rebuild.
Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Nozbe setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.