Helpdesk

Migrate your Jelly data

A flat-rate shared inbox for small teams that handles email collaboration without per-seat pricing or feature bloat. Teams migrating in bring conversations and shared addresses; teams migrating out face no documented export path.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Jelly logo

In its favor

Why people choose Jelly

The signal that keeps Jelly on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Jelly charges a flat monthly rate with no per-seat fee, making it significantly cheaper than Front or Zendesk for growing teams that need the whole company in the inbox.

The feature set is intentionally narrow — shared email, team assignment, conversation threads — which eliminates the learning curve that bogs down Front and Missive for small teams.

Real human support from a small company is consistently praised in reviews, distinguishing Jelly from large helpdesk vendors with automated or tiered support models.

Annual billing offers 1–2 months free, reducing the effective cost for teams that commit ahead of time.

The Slack integration in Royal Jelly provides lightweight alerting without requiring agents to leave their existing communication tool.

Teams outgrow the narrow feature set and need multi-channel support, advanced automation rules, or a knowledge base that Jelly does not provide.

Royal Jelly's roadmap features (enhanced contacts, reporting, sent-mail sync) remain undelivered, pushing teams toward more mature platforms.

The lack of a documented API means teams with custom integration needs cannot connect Jelly to their existing tooling programmatically.

Small-team product risk: as a niche shared inbox, Jelly may lack the engineering investment to keep pace with security and compliance requirements.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Jelly

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Jelly. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Jelly fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Flat-rate pricing with unlimited team members and unlimited conversations.Minimal, focused feature set designed for shared email without multi-channel complexity.Real human customer support — no chatbots, no tiered support gates.Royal Jelly adds Slack integration and lifts the shared-address cap at a modest price increase.Clean, opinionated UX built specifically for small-team email collaboration.

Weaknesses

No publicly documented API or bulk data export mechanism, making outbound migration difficult.No knowledge base, no multi-channel support, no advanced automation — limits suitability to simple shared inbox use cases.Royal Jelly's feature roadmap (stats, enhanced contacts, sent-mail sync) is not yet delivered.Small-product risk: limited engineering team and no clear public roadmap cadence.No third-party integrations beyond Slack (Royal Jelly), limiting ecosystem connectivity.

Where it works

Small teams of 2–15 people who need a collaborative email inbox without per-seat pricing inflating costs as the team grows.Small businesses and agencies that rely primarily on email for customer communication and have no need for phone, chat, or social channels.Teams migrating from informal shared Gmail or Outlook aliases to a structured shared inbox with basic assignment and visibility.Organizations that prioritize real human support over self-service documentation and are comfortable relying on a small vendor for ongoing assistance.Slack-centric teams that want lightweight email notifications pushed into their existing communication tool without additional complexity.

Where it struggles

Teams that have grown beyond email-only support and need multi-channel coverage including live chat, phone, or social media integration.Organizations with compliance, legal, or IT requirements that mandate structured data export, audit trails, or programmatic API access.Growing companies that require automation rules, SLA tracking, escalation workflows, or a knowledge base to scale support operations.Teams with custom integration needs connecting Jelly to CRMs, marketing tools, or internal systems—Jelly has no documented API for programmatic connectivity.Mid-sized businesses or enterprises expecting product maturity, regular feature releases, and a clear public roadmap from a well-resourced engineering team.

Pricing tiers

Jelly pricing overview

Jelly charges a flat monthly or annual rate per workspace, not per seat. The Jelly tier at $29/month allows up to 3 shared email addresses; Royal Jelly at $69/month removes the address cap and adds Slack integration and a roadmap of additional features.

Jelly

Tier 1 of 2

$29.00/month (~$25.83/month billed annually, 1 month free)

What's included

Unlimited team membersUnlimited conversationsUp to 3 shared email addressesReal human support

Need help selecting your Helpdesk?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Jelly's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Jelly object support

Object-by-object support for Jelly migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Conversations

Mapping required

Conversations are the core object in Jelly — flat threads of inbound and outbound messages on a shared address. We map threads to the destination's equivalent (Tickets, Threads, Messages) and preserve the last-assigned owner state. No custom conversation fields exist, so no field mapping is required.

Shared Email Addresses

Fully supported

Shared email addresses are the top-level container for conversations. The Jelly tier limits how many addresses are allowed; Royal Jelly lifts this to unlimited. We migrate the address itself and associate all related conversations to it at the destination.

Team Members

Mapping required

Jelly has no formal user directory API. Team members are identified by their email and conversation assignments. We map them to Users or Agents at the destination and flag any unresolvable email addresses for manual review.

Conversation Assignments

Mapping required

A Jelly conversation can be assigned to a single team member at a time. We preserve the assignee field as a custom property at the destination when the target does not have native assignment on conversation objects.

Tags

Mapping required

Jelly supports tagging conversations but does not expose tags via any documented API. We extract tags from IMAP headers or customer-supplied exports where available, otherwise tags are noted as a gap in the migration scope.

Slack Integration (Royal Jelly)

Not in this platform

Royal Jelly's Slack integration notifies channels of new conversations. This is a live notification bridge, not stored data, and has no exportable schema. We do not migrate Slack integration configuration.

Enhanced Contacts (Royal Jelly, roadmap)

Not in this platform

Enhanced Contacts is listed as a forthcoming feature in Royal Jelly. As it is not yet shipped, we do not support it as a migration target. It may land as a simple contact card with no custom fields.

Stats and Reporting (Royal Jelly, roadmap)

Not in this platform

Stats and reporting are listed as forthcoming in Royal Jelly. Aggregated analytics are not a migratable data object and are excluded from scope.

Attachments

Not in this platform

Jelly surfaces email attachments inline within conversations. The platform does not expose an attachment storage API, and we have not found a documented attachment export path in any published endpoint or customer-accessible feature.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Jelly migrations

Issues we've hit on past Jelly migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No documented API for data export

Medium

Per-address conversation cap on Jelly tier

Medium

Royal Jelly roadmap features are not shippable migration targets

High

Attachment export not accessible via API

How a Jelly migration works

Four steps, Jelly-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Jelly. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Jelly-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Jelly quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Jelly rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Jelly migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Jelly migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Jelly migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Jelly migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Jelly.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Jelly setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported