CRM migration

Migrate from InfoTrack to HubSpot

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between InfoTrack and HubSpot. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in HubSpot.

InfoTrack logo

InfoTrack

Source

HubSpot

Destination

HubSpot logo

Compatibility

100%

13 of 13

objects map 1:1 between InfoTrack and HubSpot.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

48–72 hours

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

InfoTrack is a legal workflow automation platform built around court eFiling, process serving, and docket syncing — it manages transactional orders and matter associations rather than functioning as a traditional CRM. HubSpot CRM operates on a contact-company-deal model with lifecycle stages, pipelines, and activity tracking. The migration requires translating InfoTrack's matter-centric data into HubSpot's contact-centric model: InfoTrack contacts map to HubSpot contacts and companies, InfoTrack matters map to HubSpot deals with custom properties carrying court-specific metadata, and transactional orders become line items or custom fields on the deal record. We use InfoTrack's API to export matter data, contact records, and order history, then map each record into HubSpot's CRM objects. Workflows, court integrations, and eFiling automations do not transfer — those must be rebuilt in HubSpot or maintained as separate tools. A delta-pickup window captures any new orders or matter updates during cutover. The mapping process also preserves original filing timestamps, ensuring that the HubSpot timeline reflects the full chronology of each matter. Custom properties are created on the deal object to hold court jurisdiction, case type, and docket identifiers, and these are populated using data extracted from InfoTrack's API. Additionally, contact roles such as attorney, process server, and opposing counsel are recorded as custom contact properties, enabling filtering and reporting in HubSpot.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

InfoTrack logo

InfoTrack

What's pushing teams away

  • Court-stamped documents and expenses stop syncing back to the Matter when the eFiling service connection drops or the integration with the case management system expires, requiring manual re-authentication to resolve.
  • Credit card processing fees apply to every transaction, and ACH carries a state-variable flat fee that accumulates into a visible line item on invoices for high-volume litigation firms.
  • No public API means there is no programmatic way to extract bulk data from InfoTrack—all data retrieval requires manual CSV export from the admin UI, which limits what can be migrated to a new platform without vendor coordination.
  • Integration keys can be lost if the account admin closes the browser during onboarding, requiring a support request to regenerate the unique firm integration key for re-establishing the case management connection.

Choosing

HubSpot logo

HubSpot

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest barrier to entry of any major CRM — the free tier with unlimited contacts lets teams validate fit before committing to a paid plan, according to G2 and Capterra reviewers.
  • Native integration between the CRM and sales engagement tools (sequences, email tracking, dialer) means no separate sync configuration, a theme across G2 Sales Hub reviews.
  • Pipeline visualization, deal tracking, and automated workflows are consistently praised as intuitive and easy to set up without developer involvement.
  • Strong onboarding for new team members — reviewers on Capterra and G2 highlight how quickly new reps become productive without formal training.
  • The HubSpot platform ecosystem (Marketing, Sales, Service, CMS hubs) allows growing companies to consolidate tools without building new integrations.

Object mapping

How InfoTrack objects map to HubSpot

Each row shows how a InfoTrack object lands in HubSpot, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

InfoTrack

Contact

maps to

HubSpot

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack contacts (attorneys, opposing counsel, process servers, clients) map directly to HubSpot contacts. Email, phone, and address fields transfer as-is. Names split into firstname and lastname properties on the HubSpot contact record. Additional custom fields such as contact_type__c and source_system_id__c are also migrated, preserving original InfoTrack IDs for later reconciliation.

InfoTrack

Contact (primary client)

maps to

HubSpot

Company + Contact

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack contacts who represent primary clients on a matter map to both a HubSpot company record (the client firm or individual) and a contact record linked via the Company Associations API. This creates the HubSpot company-contact hierarchy that drives deal ownership.

InfoTrack

Matter

maps to

HubSpot

Deal

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack matters map to HubSpot deals. The matter name becomes the deal name. Matter status (active, closed, pending) maps to deal stage values. Each InfoTrack matter becomes one HubSpot deal record with the client contact and company linked. Custom properties for court case number, jurisdiction, and case type are populated from the source matter fields.

InfoTrack

Matter.custom_case_number

maps to

HubSpot

Deal.custom_case_number__c

1:1
Fully supported

Court case numbers (e.g., federal district case numbers, state docket identifiers) have no native HubSpot equivalent. We create a custom text property (custom_case_number__c) on the deal record and populate it from InfoTrack's case number field. This field is indexed for search and used in filtering pipelines by court jurisdiction.

InfoTrack

Matter.court_jurisdiction

maps to

HubSpot

Deal.court_jurisdiction__c

1:1
Fully supported

Jurisdiction information (court name, county, state) migrates as a custom pick-list property on the deal so HubSpot workflows can route based on court jurisdiction. We map InfoTrack's jurisdiction values to a HubSpot pick-list. Pick-list values are reviewed and approved before migration to ensure consistency across all records.

InfoTrack

Matter.case_type

maps to

HubSpot

Deal.case_type__c

1:1
Fully supported

Case type (e.g., civil litigation, family law, bankruptcy) migrates as a custom pick-list property on the deal. This enables HubSpot reporting by case type and pipeline filtering. The pick-list includes all case types present in InfoTrack, and values are mapped to matching HubSpot options where available, with new values created as needed.

InfoTrack

Order (efiling, process serving, signing)

maps to

HubSpot

Deal Line Item

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack orders become HubSpot deal line items attached to the matter-deal. Each order type (efiling, process serving, SignIT) becomes a line item with quantity=1 and the order cost as the amount. Order status (pending, completed, failed) is preserved as a line item property.

InfoTrack

Court Filing Record

maps to

HubSpot

Deal Note / Custom Property

1:1
Fully supported

Individual court filings attached to a matter become deal notes with the filing date, document type, and filing status. For reporting, we also aggregate filing counts into a custom numeric property (total_filings__c) on the deal. The notes include the filing party and court location for additional context.

InfoTrack

Service Attempt Record

maps to

HubSpot

Deal Note / Custom Property

1:1
Fully supported

Process serving attempts (date, address, status) become deal notes with the engagement timeline. Attempt counts aggregate into custom properties (service_attempts__c, service_status__c) for quick pipeline filtering. Each note records the server's name, the attempt number, and any returned status such as served, attempted, or unsuccessful.

InfoTrack

User (InfoTrack admin/user)

maps to

HubSpot

User

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack users (attorneys, paralegals, admins) with email addresses are resolved against HubSpot users by email match. Unmatched users are flagged for admin action — either invite them to HubSpot or assign their matter records to a fallback HubSpot owner. The resolution process also preserves the original InfoTrack user ID on the HubSpot user record for audit trails.

InfoTrack

Invoice

maps to

HubSpot

Custom Property / Deal Note

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack invoices are preserved as deal notes with the invoice number, date, and amount. For billing reconciliation, total invoice amounts aggregate into a custom currency property (total_invoiced__c) on the deal record. Each note also includes the client name and a reference to the related matter for traceability.

InfoTrack

Integration Link (Time Matters, LEAP, Clio)

maps to

HubSpot

N/A — no equivalent

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack's bi-directional sync with Time Matters, LEAP, and Clio has no HubSpot equivalent. These integrations must be disconnected post-migration and rebuilt as HubSpot integrations if needed. Matter data migrated to HubSpot deals does not sync back to the case management system.

InfoTrack

Workflow / Automation (eFiling triggers, court-return automations)

maps to

HubSpot

N/A — no equivalent

1:1
Fully supported

InfoTrack eFiling workflows and court-return automations do not transfer to HubSpot. They must be rebuilt using HubSpot workflows if automation is needed for case status updates. We export workflow definitions as a rebuild reference for your HubSpot admin. The exported definitions include trigger conditions, actions, and any custom logic used in the original workflows.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

InfoTrack logo

InfoTrack gotchas

High

InfoTrack is a workflow layer with no standalone CRM data model

Medium

Custom folder sync for documents requires Time Matters 16.6+

High

No public API means bulk export requires manual CSV downloads

Medium

Integration keys must be regenerated when reconnecting to a new case management system

Medium

Per-order invoice granularity complicates matter-level billing reconstruction

HubSpot logo

HubSpot gotchas

High

Marketing Contacts billing model is migration-critical

High

Feature tier gating is not visible until onboarding

Medium

Mandatory onboarding fees inflate year-one cost

Medium

HubSpot CSV importer cannot migrate engagements or attachments

Medium

Custom objects require Enterprise and a pre-existing schema

Pair-specific challenges

  • Matter-centric data requires contact-centric restructuring in HubSpot

    InfoTrack's primary record is the Matter, with contacts linked as matter participants. HubSpot's primary record is the Contact, with deals linked to contacts and companies. This means InfoTrack matters with multiple parties (opposing counsel, co-defendants, process servers) must be decomposed: the primary client becomes the HubSpot contact-company, and other parties are linked via contact associations or stored as custom properties. Firms that relied on InfoTrack's flat matter-contact model may need to redesign their HubSpot contact hierarchy before migration runs.

  • Order history cannot replicate InfoTrack's transactional billing view

    InfoTrack's order management tracks each eFiling, process serving, and signing transaction with its own status, cost, and billing attribution. HubSpot deal line items capture order data but do not support the same depth of transactional status tracking (e.g., court-returned, rejected, re-filed). We aggregate order data into line items and preserve original order IDs, but the granular order-status timeline visible in InfoTrack requires a custom HubSpot app or rebuilt billing dashboard to replicate.

  • Court case numbers and jurisdiction data need custom property setup before migration

    HubSpot deals have no native fields for court case numbers, jurisdiction, or case type. These must be created as custom properties (case_number__c, jurisdiction__c, case_type__c) before migration data lands. If these properties are not pre-created, the court metadata will arrive as unstructured text in the deal name or notes, breaking pipeline filtering and reporting by jurisdiction. We deliver a HubSpot property setup plan before migration runs. We recommend testing these custom properties in a HubSpot sandbox before the live migration to confirm that picklist values map correctly and that pipeline views render the metadata as intended.

  • eFiling and process-serving automations do not transfer and must be rebuilt

    InfoTrack's eFiling workflows (court-return triggers, auto-filing schedules, rejection handling) and process-serving automation (attempt scheduling, address verification) are platform-specific and cannot be exported as transferable logic. They must be rebuilt in HubSpot using workflows, sequences, or a third-party automation layer. We export InfoTrack workflow definitions as a rebuild reference document, but the automation itself is net-new work in HubSpot. Your team will need to define new triggers in HubSpot based on the exported definitions, map court-return events to appropriate HubSpot actions, and set up notifications for rejected filings. The rebuilt workflows can leverage HubSpot's native workflow builder, third-party tools, or custom API integrations depending on complexity.

  • Integration links to Time Matters, LEAP, and Clio break post-migration

    InfoTrack's bi-directional sync with Time Matters, LEAP, and Clio case management systems means that matter data in InfoTrack reflects live updates from those systems. After migration to HubSpot, those integration links are severed — matter data in HubSpot will not reflect new filings or case updates from the case management system. Firms must decide whether to maintain InfoTrack for integrations only, rebuild integrations as HubSpot connections, or accept a manual update workflow.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful InfoTrack to HubSpot data migration

  1. Audit InfoTrack data and design HubSpot property schema

    We pull a full export from InfoTrack covering contacts, companies, matters, orders, and court filing records. We then audit record counts, identify custom fields used per matter type, and count jurisdiction and case-type variations. Based on the audit, we deliver a HubSpot property setup plan: which custom properties to create on deals (case_number__c, jurisdiction__c, case_type__c, etc.) and which pick-list values to pre-populate before data arrives.

  2. Map InfoTrack contacts to HubSpot contact-company hierarchy

    InfoTrack contacts are mapped to HubSpot contacts and companies. Primary clients on a matter become both a HubSpot contact and a company record linked via the Company Associations API. Contact roles (attorney, process server, opposing counsel) are preserved as a custom contact property. Duplicate contacts (same person across multiple matters) are identified by email and de-duplicated before migration. The mapping also ensures that each contact's association to the relevant deal is correctly set, allowing the HubSpot timeline to display the full matter history for that contact.

  3. Translate matters to HubSpot deals with custom court metadata

    Each InfoTrack matter becomes a HubSpot deal. The matter name maps to dealname, status maps to dealstage, and court metadata (case number, jurisdiction, case type) populates custom properties created in step 1. Primary client contact and company are linked to the deal via the HubSpot Associations API. Owner assignment resolves by email match against HubSpot users. The deal's pipeline stage is set according to the matter status, and any associated order or filing counts are recorded as custom numeric fields for reporting purposes.

  4. Migrate orders and invoices as deal line items and notes

    InfoTrack orders (efiling, process serving, signing) become HubSpot deal line items attached to the corresponding matter-deal. Order type, cost, date, and status populate line item properties. Court filing records and service attempts become deal notes with original timestamps. Invoice summaries aggregate into deal custom properties for billing reconciliation. All original InfoTrack order IDs are preserved for traceability. Each line item also records the order's source (e.g., eFiling or process serving) as a custom property, enabling filtering by service type in HubSpot reports.

  5. Run sample migration with field-level diff before full run

    A representative slice of records migrates first — typically 50–200 records spanning contacts, companies, deals, and line items. We generate a field-level diff between the InfoTrack source and HubSpot destination so you can verify contact-company mapping, court metadata in custom properties, deal stage assignment, and line item population before the full run commits. Discrepancies are corrected in the mapping plan before the final migration.

  6. Cut over with delta-pickup and integration decommission

    Full migration runs against HubSpot. A delta-pickup window (24–48 hours) captures any new contacts, matters, or orders created in InfoTrack during the cutover. After delta-pickup completes, InfoTrack integrations with Time Matters, LEAP, and Clio are decommissioned and pointed to HubSpot. Audit log captures every operation, and one-click rollback is available if reconciliation fails. Workflow rebuild planning begins post-migration. The cutover plan includes a final data validation step to confirm that all deals reflect the latest status before switching user access.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

InfoTrack logo

InfoTrack

Source

Strengths

  • Covers US federal, bankruptcy, and state court eFiling in a single platform with real-time docket syncing.
  • Bidirectional sync with integrated case management systems means court-returned documents and expenses land directly in the Matter without manual steps.
  • Pay-per-use model with no subscription, no per-seat licensing, and no setup fees for firms with variable litigation volume.
  • Integrated process serving network with up to five attempts per order and automated status updates.
  • Pre-population of court forms from Matter data reduces data entry errors and accelerates filing turnaround.

Weaknesses

  • InfoTrack is not a standalone practice management system—it requires an integrated case management system to manage contacts, matters, and client billing.
  • No documented public API for bulk data retrieval; all exports require manual CSV download from the admin panel.
  • Limited to US federal and state court workflows; not applicable for international, immigration, or transactional law practices.
  • Credit card processing fees and state-variable ACH fees add cost complexity for high-volume litigation firms.
  • Integration key loss during onboarding requires a support ticket to resolve, creating friction when reconfiguring integrations.
HubSpot logo

HubSpot

Destination

Strengths

  • Genuinely useful free CRM tier with no seat limit on contact records.
  • All-in-one sales engagement layer (sequences, email tracking, calling, dialer) embedded natively in the CRM, eliminating a separate integration.
  • Intuitive interface and fast onboarding for individual reps, per G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Workflow automation triggers across contacts, deals, and tickets with a visual builder.
  • API coverage for all standard objects including custom objects at Enterprise tier.

Weaknesses

  • Pricing model is contact-based at the marketing layer — importing all records as marketing contacts can multiply the monthly bill by 4×.
  • Feature tier cliffs are frequent surprises: sequences, calling, advanced reporting, and quoting are all gated, often requiring plan upgrades mid-implementation.
  • Mandatory onboarding fees at Professional ($1,500) and Enterprise ($3,500) are not prominently disclosed on the pricing page.
  • API rate limits are restrictive for bulk migration — burst limits of 100-200 req/10sec and search endpoint limits of 4 req/sec require careful job queuing.
  • Custom objects, additional pipelines, and advanced forecasting are Enterprise-only, making cost projections difficult for growing teams.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate CRM migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across InfoTrack and HubSpot.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    InfoTrack: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    InfoTrack doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your InfoTrack to HubSpot migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about InfoTrack to HubSpot data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during InfoTrack to HubSpot migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your InfoTrack to HubSpot migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most InfoTrack-to-HubSpot migrations complete in 48–72 hours of clock time for under 10,000 records. Larger setups with 50,000+ records, complex matter-contact associations, or multiple court jurisdictions extend to 7–10 days. The longest planning step is designing the HubSpot custom property schema for court metadata (case numbers, jurisdiction, case type) before data arrives. Pre-building those properties in HubSpot before migration day is the most effective way to compress the timeline.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from InfoTrack.
Land in HubSpot, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day