HRMS

Migrate your eArcu data

Talent acquisition suite covering career sites, applicant tracking, assessments, and onboarding for enterprise organisations across multiple continents.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
eArcu logo

In its favor

Why people choose eArcu

The signal that keeps eArcu on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Highly configurable candidate-facing experience lets enterprise brands (British Airways, Volkswagen Financial, Virgin Active) present a hiring process aligned to their culture and employer brand.

Built-in assessment suite with cognitive tests, personality questionnaires, and situational judgement tests reduces the need for third-party screening vendors.

Responsive, mobile-adaptive career portal keeps candidates engaged across devices and provides real-time application status tracking throughout the hiring process.

Social media job distribution to LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter centralises recruitment marketing activity within a single platform rather than across disconnected tools.

End-to-end coverage from career sites through onboarding reduces the number of integrations, suppliers, and overall total cost for talent acquisition operations.

After the PageUp brand consolidation following the EQT acquisition, some customers evaluate alternatives when their contract renewal aligns with the rebrand rollout timeline.

Customers seeking a broader HCM footprint beyond talent acquisition eventually consolidate onto platforms like Workday or SAP SuccessFactors that offer payroll and core HR in a single suite.

Organisations with complex multi-country hiring requirements report that localisation and compliance features for certain regions lag behind purpose-built global HR platforms.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave eArcu

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing eArcu. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where eArcu fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

End-to-end talent acquisition covering career sites, ATS, assessments, and onboarding in one platform.Configurable hiring pipelines and stage definitions per requisition type.Integrated assessment suite reducing reliance on third-party screening vendors.Responsive candidate-facing portal with real-time application status updates.Social recruitment tools distributing job postings directly to LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.

Weaknesses

Public API documentation is not readily accessible, limiting direct integrations and migration tooling options.Following the PageUp brand consolidation, customers may face uncertainty about product roadmap direction and support continuity.Enterprise-grade reporting and analytics capabilities lag behind standalone BI platforms.No publicly documented bulk export or migration tooling to facilitate data portability.

Where it works

Large enterprise organizations (British Airways, Volkswagen Financial, Virgin Active, DHL) seeking a configurable, brand-aligned candidate experience without managing multiple recruitment vendors.Mid-to-large multinationals running end-to-end talent acquisition across career sites, ATS, assessments, and onboarding in a single platform to reduce integration overhead.High-volume hiring operations that require social media job distribution to LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter alongside a mobile-responsive candidate portal.Organizations wanting integrated pre-employment assessments (cognitive, personality, situational judgement) without additional third-party screening vendors.Companies hiring across multiple continents that need a unified hiring process while maintaining country-specific configurable workflows.

Where it struggles

Organizations requiring comprehensive HCM functionality beyond talent acquisition (payroll, core HR, learning management) that eventually consolidate onto platforms like Workday or SAP SuccessFactors.Companies with complex multi-country hiring requiring deep localization and regulatory compliance features for certain regions, where purpose-built global HR platforms offer stronger coverage.Technical teams needing transparent API documentation and bulk export tooling to build custom integrations or facilitate data portability, as public API documentation is not readily accessible.Enterprises requiring advanced reporting and analytics capabilities comparable to standalone BI platforms, where eArcu's native analytics lag behind specialist tools.Organizations evaluating talent acquisition vendors during or around the PageUp brand consolidation following the EQT acquisition, where roadmap continuity and support structures may be in flux.

Pricing tiers

eArcu pricing overview

eArcu does not publish pricing on its website. Plans are offered on a per-seat or per-module basis with custom enterprise quotes that vary by organisation size, feature scope, and deployment region. Annual contract terms are standard.

Enterprise

Tier 1 of 3

Custom (per-request)

What's included

Full suite access including career sites, ATS, assessments, and onboardingConfigurable pipelines, custom fields, and role-based permissionsDedicated account management and implementation supportMulti-country and multi-language deployment options

Need help selecting your HRMS?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on eArcu's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

eArcu object support

Object-by-object support for eArcu migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Candidates

Mapping required

Candidate records carry name, contact details, work history, and custom profile fields. We extract all standard fields and map any custom properties to the destination schema. Assessment scores and tags stored on the candidate record are preserved as custom fields in the target system.

Job Requisitions

Mapping required

Requisitions include title, department, location, employment type, and pipeline assignment. We map requisition metadata and preserve any custom approval workflow configurations by documenting them as a separate step in the migration runbook.

Applications

Fully supported

Application records link a Candidate to a Requisition with timestamps for each stage transition. These map directly to standard application objects in most destination ATS platforms.

Hiring Stages / Pipeline Stages

Mapping required

eArcu supports configurable pipeline stages per requisition. We extract the full stage history per application including stage-entry dates, which we translate to the destination pipeline's stage model.

Assessments

Mapping required

Cognitive test results, personality questionnaire scores, and situational judgement data are stored as linked records attached to the candidate. We export raw scores and assessment types; mapping to the destination's assessment object depends on whether the target system has an equivalent evaluation module.

Career Site Content

Mapping required

Career portal pages, job board widgets, and branding assets are HTML and CSS configurations rather than structured database records. We export the content export package where available and flag any assets that require re-authoring in the destination platform.

Documents / Attachments

Mapping required

CVs, cover letters, and supporting files attached to candidates or applications are binary blobs stored in eArcu's document store. We extract and re-upload these to the destination ATS, preserving original filenames and association to the correct candidate record.

Hiring Team / Users

Mapping required

User accounts, roles, and permissions define who can view or act on requisitions and candidates. We export the user roster with role assignments and map to the destination's permission model.

Offers

Mapping required

Offer records include compensation details, start dates, and approval status. Where the destination ATS has a separate offer object, we map fields directly; otherwise we attach offer data as custom properties on the application record.

Onboarding Packages

Not in this platform

Animated onboarding content and structured onboarding task lists are platform-native configurations that cannot be meaningfully transferred to a different ATS. We export the package structure as a reference document for rebuilding manually in the destination system.

Gotchas

What to watch for in eArcu migrations

Issues we've hit on past eArcu migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Post-acquisition brand consolidation creates schema ambiguity

Medium

No publicly documented API limits export feasibility

Low

Onboarding content cannot be programmatically migrated

How a eArcu migration works

Four steps, eArcu-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into eArcu. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate eArcu-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate eArcu quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with eArcu rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

eArcu migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during eArcu migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your eArcu migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most eArcu migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate eArcu.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your eArcu setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported