Project Management

Migrate your farmerswife data

Specialized production management and resource scheduling software for media, broadcast, and post-production teams with 25 years of vertical-specific workflows.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
farmerswife logo

In its favor

Why people choose farmerswife

The signal that keeps farmerswife on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Resource scheduling depth unmatched by generic PM tools—farmerswife tracks crew, studios, edit suites, and equipment availability across time slots in one view.

Advanced financial reporting from quote through invoice gives media producers real-time cost-to-completion visibility within the same platform.

Client portal and budget management built for production companies handling complex client rate cards and multi-project invoicing cycles.

Specialized support team staffed by media professionals who understand the vocabulary and workflows of broadcast, post-production, and film production.

Scalable from small crewing agencies to large multi-department media organisations with role-based permissions and division-level reporting.

English-only interface limits adoption in multilingual production teams working across international shoots and co-productions.

The desktop-first architecture feels dated compared to browser-based alternatives, particularly for remote coordinators who need web access.

Equipment handling and asset tracking lacks the streamlined barcode or RFID integration that production coordinators expect on set.

Upgrades require careful version-step sequencing and can introduce login or connectivity errors if not performed in order.

Pricing requires a direct sales conversation with no published per-seat range, making budget approval difficult for small agencies.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave farmerswife

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing farmerswife. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where farmerswife fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Deep resource scheduling for crew, studios, edit suites, and production equipment with real-time availability views.Integrated financial workflow from quote through budget to invoice within a single platform.Multi-layer rate permission system that separates Project Rates from Client Rates for granular access control.CSV-based import/export provides a reliable data portability path without requiring the licensed REST API.Specialist support from media-industry professionals who understand production terminology and workflows.

Weaknesses

Desktop-first application with limited browser-based access for remote or distributed production teams.English-only interface restricts adoption in international and multilingual media organisations.Licensed REST API adds cost and requires separate commercial engagement to enable programmatic exports.Server migration requires careful version-step upgrades and manual file folder management rather than self-service tooling.Pricing is opaque—no public per-seat or tier range—complicating budget planning for smaller agencies.

Where it works

Mid-to-large media production companies managing multi-department, multi-location operations with role-based permissions and division-level financial reporting.Broadcast and post-production facilities that need integrated resource scheduling across studios, edit suites, and equipment with real-time cost-to-completion tracking.Film crewing agencies handling high-volume crew rosters (100+ resources per project) with complex weekly invoicing cycles and multiple rate structures.Production companies requiring specialized financial workflows from quote through invoice with granular client rate and project rate permission hierarchies.English-speaking production teams operating in studio or office environments where desktop client access is acceptable.

Where it struggles

Remote or distributed production coordinators who require full browser-based access without installing desktop client software.International and multilingual production teams working across co-productions, international shoots, or non-English-speaking crew members.On-set operations that need barcode or RFID equipment scanning to track gear check-in and check-out in real time.Small agencies or startups that require transparent published pricing to obtain budget approval without engaging a sales cycle.Organizations seeking modern SaaS tooling with self-service migration paths and API access included in standard subscriptions.

Pricing tiers

farmerswife pricing overview

farmerswife uses a custom, contact-for-pricing model with per-user billing. The Capterra listing shows an indicative starting price of $200/user/month but the official website emphasises a 'design your solution' approach with no public tier breakdown. API access requires a separate commercial agreement beyond the standard subscription.

Contact Sales

Tier 1 of 1

$200/user/month (indicative from Capterra)

What's included

Flexible, user-based pricing modelNo published public tiers—pricing designed per-customerRequires direct sales conversationAPI access is a separate licensed feature

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on farmerswife's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

farmerswife object support

Object-by-object support for farmerswife migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Projects are the central container in farmerswife, holding Activities, Bookings, Budgets, and Files. We map them 1:1 and preserve all standard fields (name, status, dates, client link). Custom fields on Projects are exported via CSV and mapped to equivalent custom fields in the destination.

Objects (People, Resources, Rooms, Services)

Fully supported

Objects is the umbrella term for people contacts, physical resources (equipment), rooms, and services. Each sub-type has distinct standard fields. We export them by Object Type and re-import into the destination's equivalent entity type. Object Custom Fields are preserved as structured CSV columns.

Object Types (Categories)

Mapping required

Object Types are broad categorical labels (e.g. 'Crew', 'Equipment', 'Studio') that organize Objects. The destination may use flat tag lists or a fixed taxonomy. We map Object Types to destination tags or custom list fields and flag any Object Types with no direct equivalent.

Activities

Fully supported

Activities are scheduled work items attached to Projects, often containing the same set of Objects (e.g. a shoot day with 150 crew members). We export Activities with their Project linkage, dates, status, and assigned Objects intact. Recurring Activity patterns are preserved where documented.

Bookings

Fully supported

Bookings represent resource assignments within Activities—each booking links a Resource/Object to an Activity at specific times. We map Bookings as line items preserving the resource reference, time window, and booking type. Rate references from Project Rate Cards are carried as metadata.

Budgets

Mapping required

Budgets in farmerswife contain line items with Price Agreements (fixed-price per item) and track cost-to-completion. We export the full budget hierarchy including line-item agreements, but note that complex per-item fixed-price structures often require manual verification in the destination's budget module.

Rate Cards and Rates

Mapping required

Rate Cards are scoped to Clients or Projects and define day rates, overtime rates, and custom pricing tiers. We export the full Rate Card structure and map it to the destination's rate or pricing module, but nested rate hierarchies (Client Rates feeding Project Rates) require explicit value-mapping.

Users and Permissions

Mapping required

Users have role-based permissions that layer Project Rates Permissions and Client Rates Permissions. We export Users with their permission flags and replicate the permission structure in the destination, noting that most destination systems use a simpler role model that may not support the same granularity.

Files and Attachments

Mapping required

Files are stored in a server-side files folder and referenced by Project. We catalogue all file references, reconstruct folder paths from the farmerswife server directory, and remap them to the destination's document attachment structure. Large media files are flagged for separate transfer.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom Fields can be added to Projects, Objects, and other entities. We export them as key-value pairs alongside standard fields. Since each customer's Custom Field schema is unique, we perform field-level mapping during the scoping call and note any destination objects that lack equivalent custom field support.

Time Entries

Fully supported

Time entries are logged against Activities and Bookings and feed into invoicing. We export time entries with their Activity and User references and map them to the destination's time tracking entity, preserving billable/non-billable flags and hours.

Clients

Fully supported

Clients are distinct entities linked to Projects and Rate Cards. We export Client records with contact details and map them to the destination's Company/Account object, preserving Client Rate Card linkage as a metadata reference.

Gotchas

What to watch for in farmerswife migrations

Issues we've hit on past farmerswife migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Licensed REST API requires separate commercial agreement

Medium

Multi-layer rate permission hierarchy does not map directly to standard role systems

Medium

CSV export uses locale-sensitive separator characters

High

Server migration requires copying specific sub-folders in exact order

Low

Price Agreement line items in Budgets use per-item fixed-price agreements

How a farmerswife migration works

Four steps, farmerswife-specific

Connect

OAuth 2.0 (implied from fw REST API documentation) into farmerswife. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate farmerswife-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate farmerswife quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with farmerswife rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

farmerswife migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during farmerswife migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your farmerswife migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most farmerswife migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate farmerswife.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your farmerswife setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported