CRM migration

Migrate from Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Shark Byte CRM and Twenty CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Twenty CRM.

Shark Byte CRM logo

Shark Byte CRM

Source

Twenty CRM

Destination

Twenty CRM logo

Compatibility

40%

4 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Shark Byte CRM and Twenty CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM is a migration from a vertical-specific, connectivity-dependent field-service tool into a modern open-source CRM with full data ownership and self-hosting capability. Shark Byte has no documented public API, which makes the extraction phase the most time-sensitive and risk-heavy part of the engagement. We work with Shark Byte file exports and coordinate directly with their team for complete data extraction. In Twenty, we build a custom object schema to accommodate Shark Byte's estimating templates, service agreements by contract-term duration (1-3 year, 3-5 year, 10+ year buckets), and work order records. Shark Byte's Customers map to Twenty's Company object, Contacts map to Person, and all vertical-specific records (Estimates, Proposals, Service Agreements, Work Orders) require custom object creation in Twenty via the /metadata API. We do not migrate Shark Byte workflows or mobile surveying templates as code; we deliver a written inventory of active configurations and attachments for the customer's admin to rebuild. Timeline ranges from three to six weeks depending on data volume and the complexity of custom field mapping.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Shark Byte CRM logo

Shark Byte CRM

What's pushing teams away

  • Small company footprint and limited public documentation make it difficult to get support, find integration guides, or verify data export capabilities when needed.
  • Fast internet connectivity required as a hard dependency for core functionality, making the platform unreliable for field technicians working in areas with spotty coverage.
  • Difficulty comparing Shark Byte against other CRM options due to limited public reviews, no public API documentation, and no published pricing tier information.
  • Technology dependency is total with no offline mode, meaning any connectivity disruption halts estimating, surveying, and proposal workflows entirely.
  • Small team size raises concerns about long-term product support, roadmap continuity, and vendor stability for companies planning multi-year CRM investments.

Choosing

Twenty CRM logo

Twenty CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Top open-source CRM on GitHub with 40.6K stars, giving teams full source code access and infrastructure ownership without per-feature licensing surprises.
  • Free self-hosting under AGPL-3.0 means unlimited users and custom objects for the cost of cloud infrastructure alone, typically $20–100/month.
  • Pricing page explicitly mocks competitors for charging add-on fees for API access, webhooks, and workflows — transparency that resonates with RevOps teams burned by Salesforce.
  • Unlimited custom objects and fields with no price impact, letting teams shape the data model to their business rather than forcing business into rigid schemas.
  • Modern TypeScript/React/PostgreSQL stack means developer-led teams can extend, self-host, or integrate without fighting legacy architecture.

Object mapping

How Shark Byte CRM objects map to Twenty CRM

Each row shows how a Shark Byte CRM object lands in Twenty CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Shark Byte CRM

Customer

maps to

Twenty CRM

Company

1:1
Fully supported

Shark Byte Customer records (representing end-client organizations or homeowners) map to Twenty Company. Standard fields including company name, address, and service history transfer as Company displayName, address fields, and custom fields. We use company name as the dedupe key during import and extract any service history as a custom field group on the Company record. Customer custom fields migrate to Company custom fields created via the /metadata API before import.

Shark Byte CRM

Contact

maps to

Twenty CRM

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Shark Byte Contact records (individual points of contact at each Customer site) map to Twenty Person. Fields including name, phone, email, and role transfer directly. Note that Twenty's Person object has been flagged by the community (GitHub issue #13953) as missing standard fields like multiple phone types, job title, department, and social profiles out of the box. We create these custom fields via /metadata during schema setup if they exist in Shark Byte.

Shark Byte CRM

Estimate

maps to

Twenty CRM

Custom Object: Estimate

lossy
Fully supported

Estimates are the core product object in Shark Byte CRM, built using the platform's estimating engine with line items, labor rates, and material costs. Because Twenty has no native estimating object, we create a custom Estimate object via the /metadata API with fields for line items, contract-term bucket (1-3 year, 3-5 year, 10+ year), pricing logic, and linked Company. We preserve the original Shark Byte estimate metadata as custom fields and link each Estimate to its originating Customer (now Company) and Contact (now Person).

Shark Byte CRM

Proposal

maps to

Twenty CRM

Custom Object: Proposal

lossy
Fully supported

Shark Byte Proposals are generated from Estimates and include pricing, scope, and terms. We create a custom Proposal object in Twenty linked to the custom Estimate object via a lookup relationship. Proposal status, scope description, terms, and associated Contact transfer as fields. Signed proposal PDFs migrate as attachments linked to the Proposal record via ContentDocumentLink.

Shark Byte CRM

Service Agreement

maps to

Twenty CRM

Custom Object: Service Agreement

lossy
Fully supported

Service Agreements in Shark Byte represent recurring contracts tied to maintenance programs, analyzed across 1-3 year, 3-5 year, and 10+ year term buckets calibrated to the customer's historical data. We create a custom Service Agreement object in Twenty with fields for contract-term classification, start and end dates, pricing structure, and linked Customer and Contact. This is the most schema-dependent mapping because Shark Byte's term buckets are customer-specific.

Shark Byte CRM

Work Order

maps to

Twenty CRM

Custom Object: Work Order

lossy
Fully supported

Work Orders track individual jobs dispatched to technicians. Mobile building surveying tools in Shark Byte feed into Work Order creation. We create a custom Work Order object in Twenty with fields for status, assigned technician, line items, and linked Customer and Contact. Survey photos and site condition attachments migrate as ContentDocument records linked via ContentDocumentLink to the Work Order.

Shark Byte CRM

Attachments

maps to

Twenty CRM

ContentDocument / ContentDocumentLink

1:1
Mapping required

Shark Byte CRM supports file attachments on Customer, Estimate, Proposal, and Work Order records. We extract all available attachments at original resolution where possible and migrate them as ContentDocument records in Twenty, linked to the appropriate parent record via ContentDocumentLink. Mobile survey images may have inconsistent compression levels and missing EXIF metadata depending on the device used; we note this during extraction and preserve filenames and upload timestamps as metadata on the ContentDocument record.

Shark Byte CRM

Custom Properties

maps to

Twenty CRM

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Shark Byte CRM supports custom fields on primary objects, particularly on Estimates and Service Agreements to accommodate industry-specific data like equipment specifications or contract classification. We create matching custom fields on Twenty's Company, Person, and custom objects via the /metadata API before data import. Each custom field is created with the correct field type (string, number, date, picklist) matched from the Shark Byte field definition.

Shark Byte CRM

Owner

maps to

Twenty CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

Shark Byte Owner records (technicians and sales users assigned to Estimates, Work Orders, and Proposals) map to Twenty User records. We resolve owners by email match where possible. Any Shark Byte Owner without a matching Twenty User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Owner assignments on Work Orders and Estimates transfer as custom owner fields or assigned-to relationships depending on the custom object schema.

Shark Byte CRM

Pipeline / Status

maps to

Twenty CRM

Custom Field or View Filter

lossy
Fully supported

Shark Byte's pipeline stages and status conventions for Estimates, Proposals, and Work Orders are custom to the account and do not map to any standard Twenty field. We create custom picklist fields on each custom object representing the relevant stage values (e.g., Estimate status: Draft, Submitted, Accepted, Lost; Work Order status: Scheduled, In Progress, Completed, On Hold). The customer approves the stage mapping during scoping.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Shark Byte CRM logo

Shark Byte CRM gotchas

High

No publicly documented API for programmatic data export

Medium

Estimating templates and contract-term mappings are custom to the account

Medium

Mobile survey attachments may have inconsistent file formats

Low

Small vendor footprint complicates support coordination during cutover

Twenty CRM logo

Twenty CRM gotchas

High

Import order is enforced and critical

High

Export limited to 20,000 records and visible columns only

Medium

Soft-deleted records count toward uniqueness and trigger restores

Medium

API rate limits cap at 200 req/min on Organization tier

Low

No native email sequences — follow-up cadences require external tools

Pair-specific challenges

  • Shark Byte CRM has no documented public API for data export

    Shark Byte CRM does not appear in any API directory or developer documentation index. There is no confirmed bulk export or REST API endpoint. We handle this by working directly with Shark Byte file exports and CSV downloads where available, and by coordinating with their team for full data extraction during migration scoping. If direct export is not available, manual record extraction is required and will extend migration timelines by two to four weeks. The extraction phase must be completed before any mapping or migration work begins, making Shark Byte's team responsiveness a direct dependency on project schedule.

  • Twenty's standard Person and Company fields are sparse

    Twenty's Person object lacks standard fields that other CRMs ship out of the box (multiple phone types, job title, department, website, social profiles, source, tags). The Company object similarly lacks industry, employee count, and annual revenue. We create these fields via /metadata during schema setup if they exist in Shark Byte, but this adds a schema design phase before data import. Migrations with complex contact profiles may require 30-60 minutes of custom field creation per object before the first record loads, per the community GitHub issue (twentyhq/twenty#13953).

  • Shark Byte's estimating templates are account-specific, not standardized

    Shark Byte's estimating engine uses contract-term buckets (1-3 year, 3-5 year, 10+ year) calibrated to the customer's own historical service contract data. These templates are not standardized objects and vary by installation. We extract each Estimate's term classification, pricing logic, and line-item structure during scoping and design a matching custom Estimate object in Twenty. Without this step, term-bucketed estimates get flattened into generic records, losing the pricing context that Shark Byte users built their workflows around.

  • Mobile survey attachments may have inconsistent file formats

    Photos and site condition data captured via Shark Byte's mobile surveying tools attach to Work Orders and Estimates. Image formats, compression levels, and metadata vary based on the mobile device used. We extract all available attachments at original resolution where possible, but some images from older mobile surveys may be compressed or missing EXIF metadata. We preserve filenames and upload timestamps as ContentDocument metadata and flag any attachments that fail integrity checks for customer review.

  • Small Shark Byte team means slow cutover coordination

    Shark Byte Systems Inc has no documented dedicated customer success or migration support function. During migration cutover, response times for data extraction requests, export coordination, and post-migration data validation may be significantly slower than with larger vendors. We build extended coordination buffers into the migration schedule and designate a single point of contact on our side to manage back-and-forth with the Shark Byte team. This typically adds one to two weeks to the extraction phase compared to vendors with documented support SLAs.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM data migration

  1. Extraction scoping and Shark Byte coordination

    We begin by auditing the Shark Byte installation to identify all Customer, Estimate, Proposal, Service Agreement, Work Order, Contact, and attachment records. Because Shark Byte has no public API, we work with the customer's team to request full data exports in whatever format Shark Byte supports (CSV, Excel, JSON). We coordinate directly with Shark Byte's small team to schedule export delivery and validate completeness before proceeding. Any manual extraction steps are documented with time estimates and added to the project schedule as an explicit extraction phase.

  2. Twenty custom object schema design

    We design the destination schema in Twenty using the /metadata API. This includes creating custom objects for Estimate, Proposal, Service Agreement, and Work Order, plus custom fields on Company and Person for any Shark Byte fields that don't map to Twenty standard fields. We define lookup relationships between custom objects and Company/Person, create picklist values for contract-term buckets and status fields, and validate the schema in a staging environment before any data loads. The customer reviews and approves the schema during this phase.

  3. Data quality audit and cleansing

    We audit the extracted Shark Byte data for duplicates, incomplete records, inconsistent formats (addresses, phone numbers, dates), and orphaned relationships (Estimates with no linked Customer, Work Orders with no assigned technician). We run data quality reports and share findings with the customer before migration. Any cleansing decisions (duplicates to merge, missing Customer links to resolve, date format normalization) are documented and executed as a separate transform step before import.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a staging environment in Twenty using production-like data volume. The customer's admin reviews record counts, spot-checks 25-50 random records against the Shark Byte source, and validates that custom field values match the original data. The owner reconciliation queue (any Shark Byte Owner without a matching Twenty User) is resolved here. The customer approves the sandbox migration before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Company records (from Shark Byte Customers), Person records (from Shark Byte Contacts), custom object schema deployment, then Estimates, Proposals, Service Agreements, and Work Orders with lookup relationships resolved. Attachments migrate as ContentDocument records linked via ContentDocumentLink. Owner assignments transfer by resolving Shark Byte Owner to Twenty User. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and configuration handoff

    We freeze Shark Byte writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Twenty as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of custom object configurations, Shark Byte field-to-Twenty field mappings, and any manual steps the admin must complete (e.g., repointing integrations, setting Twenty user permissions). We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Shark Byte surveying workflows or estimating templates as Twenty automations; those are documented for the customer's admin to configure.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Shark Byte CRM logo

Shark Byte CRM

Source

Strengths

  • Vertical-specific data model built around service agreements and maintenance contracts rather than generic deal stages.
  • Estimating engine grounded in real-world contract data across multiple service-term durations.
  • Integrated mobile surveying tool that captures site conditions and feeds directly into the estimate pipeline.
  • Proposal generation tightly coupled with the estimating workflow for a streamlined quote-to-signature process.
  • Specialization in mechanical service, plumbing, and HVAC markets means terminology and defaults match industry workflows.

Weaknesses

  • Very small company (3-14 employees, $1.7M revenue) with limited public documentation and no published API reference.
  • No public pricing information available, making cost-of-migration and total-cost-of-ownership estimates difficult to scope upfront.
  • Full dependency on internet connectivity with no offline capability, a significant risk for field-first service businesses.
  • Limited review corpus on major platforms (G2, Capterra) makes independent evaluation of long-term satisfaction difficult.
  • Unknown third-party integration ecosystem; no evidence of Zapier, native accounting, or scheduling tool connectors.
Twenty CRM logo

Twenty CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • AGPL-3.0 open-source license with full source code on GitHub — no vendor lock-in, no sunset risk.
  • Unlimited users and unlimited custom objects on self-hosted, with no feature gating based on headcount.
  • REST and GraphQL APIs available on all paid tiers, not locked behind an enterprise add-on fee.
  • MCP server and webhooks shipped as standard features, not premium upgrades.
  • Modern PostgreSQL-backed data model that developer teams can query, extend, and self-host.

Weaknesses

  • Recent v1.0 release means limited production hardening compared to CRMs with multi-year operational track records.
  • No native email sequencing or sales engagement tools — follow-up cadences require a separate platform.
  • No native two-way email sync or inbox integration, requiring third-party connectors for full activity logging.
  • Self-hosting 'free' pricing hides real infrastructure and DevOps costs that stack up over time.
  • Workflow automation is functional but lacks the complexity needed for sophisticated multi-step sales motions.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard CRM migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Shark Byte CRM and Twenty CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Shark Byte CRM: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Shark Byte CRM doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Shark Byte CRM to Twenty CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 Customer records and 2,000 Estimates with straightforward field mappings and no multi-term service agreement complexity. Migrations with large Work Order histories (over 3,000 records), attachments requiring file format normalization, or service agreements across multiple contract-term buckets extend to six to ten weeks. The extraction phase, which depends on Shark Byte team responsiveness for data exports, is the primary variable that determines whether a migration stays in the short timeline or extends.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Shark Byte CRM.
Land in Twenty CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day