HRMS

Migrate your AgileATS data

Purpose-built ATS for government contractors with OFCCP compliance, clearance tracking, and GovCon-specific workflows. Small to mid-size teams in federal contracting are its core audience.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
AgileATS logo

In its favor

Why people choose AgileATS

The signal that keeps AgileATS on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Native OFCCP, DoL, and EEO reporting eliminates manual compliance work that most ATS platforms leave to spreadsheet exports and external auditors.

ClearanceJobs native integration lets recruiters push cleared candidates directly into AgileATS in one click, skipping copy-paste pipelines common in general-purpose ATS tools.

Tiered candidate storage (10k to 50k+) maps cleanly to real headcount budgets for small and mid-size government contractors without forcing enterprise pricing.

The Agile Recruiting framework enforces structured, audit-ready hiring workflows that satisfy government contract proposal requirements and DCAA audit expectations.

AWS-hosted candidate data with defined security protocols addresses GovCon security concerns that generic ATS platforms handle poorly or as an afterthought.

Per-seat pricing scales steeply once more than a handful of full recruiters are added, pushing total cost above comparable platforms with flat or unlimited-user tiers.

The platform is narrow in scope — teams outside government contracting find the GovCon-specific features irrelevant and feel they are paying for compliance tooling they never use.

Limited third-party integrations beyond ClearanceJobs means teams relying on background check vendors, HRIS platforms, or onboarding tools often need workarounds or custom API builds.

Customer support responsiveness is inconsistent, particularly on non-Enterprise tiers where response times for technical or data export questions can stretch across multiple business days.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave AgileATS

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing AgileATS. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where AgileATS fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Purpose-built OFCCP, DoL, and EEO compliance reporting with automated generation rather than manual exports.ClearanceJobs native integration provides direct, one-click candidate ingestion from the largest cleared talent pool.AWS-hosted data with defined security protocols satisfies GovCon security and data handling requirements.Structured Agile Recruiting workflows enforce consistent, auditable hiring steps across every open requisition.Tiered candidate storage (10k to 50k+) provides predictable scaling for small to mid-size government contractors.

Weaknesses

No public REST API — all data access relies on structured file exports, limiting automation options for ongoing sync or live migrations.Per-seat pricing on core recruiter licenses scales cost significantly as hiring teams grow beyond the initial plan.Limited third-party ecosystem beyond ClearanceJobs forces teams to build custom integrations for background checks, HRIS, or onboarding tools.Support responsiveness on non-Enterprise tiers lags behind competitors, particularly for data export or technical scoping questions.

Where it works

Small to mid-size government contractors with 11–200 employees who hold active federal contracts and must satisfy OFCCP, DoL, and EEO reporting requirements as part of annual audits or contract rebids.GovCon recruiting teams that rely heavily on ClearanceJobs as their primary cleared talent source and want one-click candidate ingestion without copy-paste pipelines or manual uploads.Companies requiring structured, audit-ready hiring workflows that satisfy DCAA audit expectations and provide documented hiring steps for government contract proposal submissions.Organizations managing candidates across multiple clearance levels (Secret, Top Secret, TS/SCI) where clearance tracking and status monitoring must be embedded directly in the recruiting pipeline.Small recruiting teams with one to five full-time recruiters whose headcount budgets map cleanly to AgileATS tiered candidate storage limits of 10k, 25k, or 50k records.

Where it struggles

Teams outside government contracting, including commercial-sector companies, where OFCCP and EEO compliance tooling represents pure overhead with no corresponding workflow benefit.Growing organizations adding more than three to five full recruiter seats, where per-seat pricing at $160–$175 per user per month scales cost significantly beyond comparable platforms with flat or unlimited-user tiers.Organizations needing live data synchronization with background check vendors, HRIS platforms, or onboarding tools that require API access, since AgileATS offers no public REST API.Teams requiring extensive customization or third-party integrations beyond ClearanceJobs, which must be built as custom API projects or handled through manual file exports.Non-Enterprise tier customers with time-sensitive technical questions or data export requests, where support response times can stretch across multiple business days.

Pricing tiers

AgileATS pricing overview

AgileATS prices per active Recruiter seat with annual billing; Partner Users are billed separately at a flat $20/month each. Candidate storage caps are enforced per tier, making the Starter tier viable only for smaller hiring volumes. Enterprise pricing is custom-negotiated and includes higher candidate limits and additional user seats.

Starter Business

Tier 1 of 3

$200/user/month (billed annually)

What's included

Up to 10,000 active Candidates1 full Recruiter seat + $175/month for second user$20/month per Partner UserInitial Training includedStandard Support

Need help selecting your HRMS?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on AgileATS's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

AgileATS object support

Object-by-object support for AgileATS migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Candidates

Fully supported

Candidates are the primary record type in AgileATS, holding profile data, contact info, status, and clearance level. We map Candidates 1:1 in most migrations; custom fields require field-level review before import to the destination.

Jobs

Fully supported

Jobs represent open reqs with title, location, clearance requirements, and pipeline assignment. We preserve job associations to their source Candidates during migration and flag any job status changes needed post-import.

Pipeline Stages

Mapping required

AgileATS uses a structured Agile Recruiting workflow with defined stages. Stage names and count vary by customer configuration, so we map each stage to a corresponding destination stage or create custom stage fields in the target system.

Offers

Fully supported

Offer records include compensation details, start dates, and status. We migrate offer data as a linked object under the candidate record, preserving the offer-to-candidate relationship throughout the import.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields are used heavily for clearance types, partner assignments, and EEO flagging. We extract all custom field definitions during scoping, map them to destination equivalents, and flag any that cannot be represented without a custom property.

Attachments

Mapping required

AgileATS stores candidate attachments (resumes, certifications, background forms) in a separate file store. We export these alongside record data and re-attach them in the destination, noting any file type or size restrictions.

Compliance Reports

Mapping required

OFCCP, DoL, and EEO reports are generated exports rather than structured data objects. We migrate the underlying data used to generate these reports so compliance can be reconstructed in the destination platform.

Users / Recruiters

Mapping required

User records include role, clearance level, and org assignment. User-to-candidate ownership must be remapped when migrating to a destination with a different user schema.

Partners / Subcontractors

Mapping required

Partner users are tracked as a separate user class in AgileATS with distinct permissions and pricing. We preserve partner assignments on candidate records but flag them for review in the destination to ensure access controls are applied correctly.

Clearance Data

Mapping required

Security clearance level and status are stored as structured fields on candidate records. We preserve clearance values explicitly and flag any candidates whose clearance status may have expired or requires re-verification in the destination system.

Notes and Activity History

Mapping required

Recruiter notes and activity timestamps are exported from AgileATS and mapped to the destination's notes or activity log schema. Activity ordering is preserved where the destination supports it.

Gotchas

What to watch for in AgileATS migrations

Issues we've hit on past AgileATS migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No public API requires structured file-based migration

High

Candidate storage caps differ by tier and are enforced

Medium

Compliance report data lives in exports, not structured records

Medium

Partner users are a distinct billing class

How a AgileATS migration works

Four steps, AgileATS-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented — no public REST API surface advertised into AgileATS. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate AgileATS-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate AgileATS quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with AgileATS rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

AgileATS migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during AgileATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your AgileATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most AgileATS migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate AgileATS.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your AgileATS setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported